<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Receipts &#8211; Barcodes: do we need them?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/receipts-barcodes-do-we-need-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/receipts-barcodes-do-we-need-them/</link>
	<description>A service of the Northeast Kansas Library System</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:16:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/receipts-barcodes-do-we-need-them/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/?p=317#comment-128</guid>
		<description>If the slips are for patrons then the barcodes make no sense.  patron barcode is of no use but first name has some merit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the slips are for patrons then the barcodes make no sense.  patron barcode is of no use but first name has some merit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Trinkle</title>
		<link>http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/receipts-barcodes-do-we-need-them/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Trinkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/?p=317#comment-117</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of a first name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of a first name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/receipts-barcodes-do-we-need-them/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/?p=317#comment-99</guid>
		<description>What if we replaced the patron barcode with a first name?  (If we can do this, Liz will have to check.)  We set it up with the patron barcode because it was more &#039;private&#039; than a full name, but for a family with multiple slips, I thought some sort of identifier was needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if we replaced the patron barcode with a first name?  (If we can do this, Liz will have to check.)  We set it up with the patron barcode because it was more &#8216;private&#8217; than a full name, but for a family with multiple slips, I thought some sort of identifier was needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonny G</title>
		<link>http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/receipts-barcodes-do-we-need-them/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonny G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/?p=317#comment-97</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m for the bar codes for reference, especially if there are more than one copy of the same item.
Currently each item fits on one line, including the bar code, which I like for a practical reason -- saves space but has enough info. for quick reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m for the bar codes for reference, especially if there are more than one copy of the same item.<br />
Currently each item fits on one line, including the bar code, which I like for a practical reason &#8212; saves space but has enough info. for quick reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/receipts-barcodes-do-we-need-them/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/?p=317#comment-96</guid>
		<description>oki doki, consider it done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oki doki, consider it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenne</title>
		<link>http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/receipts-barcodes-do-we-need-them/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/?p=317#comment-94</guid>
		<description>We think it looks just fine too.
Thanks for the fix!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We think it looks just fine too.<br />
Thanks for the fix!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy N</title>
		<link>http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/receipts-barcodes-do-we-need-them/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/?p=317#comment-93</guid>
		<description>yes - I like this mock-up too.  looks good - easy to read - the most important feature for our patrons.  thanks for working to make this - well, workable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes &#8211; I like this mock-up too.  looks good &#8211; easy to read &#8211; the most important feature for our patrons.  thanks for working to make this &#8211; well, workable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/receipts-barcodes-do-we-need-them/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/?p=317#comment-92</guid>
		<description>After talking to the staff at Bonner Springs we like the looks of the receipt mock-up that was sent out.  It is definitely easier to read then the current receipt!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After talking to the staff at Bonner Springs we like the looks of the receipt mock-up that was sent out.  It is definitely easier to read then the current receipt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: royce</title>
		<link>http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/receipts-barcodes-do-we-need-them/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>royce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/?p=317#comment-90</guid>
		<description>After seeing the receipt mock-up that was sent out. I like the carriage return then the barcode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After seeing the receipt mock-up that was sent out. I like the carriage return then the barcode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/receipts-barcodes-do-we-need-them/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nexpresslibrary.org/?p=317#comment-89</guid>
		<description>I think the receipt is for patron&#039;s use and they do not need the barcode. Staff has other, more efficient, ways to get this information.

This will produce a better looking and easier to read receipt. 

Also now that printing a slip is an option here, we will be asking patrons if they want a slip and I am positive that most will decline. 

Like Cathy, my staff doesn&#039;t see a need for the barcode and REALLY doesn&#039;t see a need for the patron barcode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the receipt is for patron&#8217;s use and they do not need the barcode. Staff has other, more efficient, ways to get this information.</p>
<p>This will produce a better looking and easier to read receipt. </p>
<p>Also now that printing a slip is an option here, we will be asking patrons if they want a slip and I am positive that most will decline. </p>
<p>Like Cathy, my staff doesn&#8217;t see a need for the barcode and REALLY doesn&#8217;t see a need for the patron barcode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

